Sat 28 Apr 2007
Competition for customers entices hospitals to better their services
Posted by raphael encaoua under medical tourism, Low cost surgery, Screenings and check up, Health & technology, Hospital marketing
Complaints are rising in the US because of the lack of price and quality informlation and health care. A study from the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) (february 2007) says the complainers are causing the problems they are so vexed about because unlike in other market qualitative information and transparen,t price are services that are available only if the end customer pays for it.
“The primary reason no one knows what doctors and hospitals charge prior to treatment is that they do not compete for patients based on price,” said NCPA President John Goodman, who co-authored the study. “When they don’t compete on price, it turns out they don’t compete on quality either. In a very real sense doctors and hospitals are not competing for patients at all.”
At the end of the day, hospitals have little stake when trying to lure patients. In fact, the orientation of a customer depends on a problem of convenience as an insurer will decide to send a customer to an hospital according to its localisation ans its belonging to the network. This game is hampering the development of the overall quality of healthcare services as insurers typically do not pay for many services that would lower overall health care cost and would improve the quality.
The NCPA study lists down the following downfalls resulting from this lack of competition:
+ No Integrated Care:
+ Taking responsibility for the treatment of a patient’s case from beginning to end.
+ No Patient Education resulting in no self care:
+ No Telephone and E-Mail Consultations:
+ No Electronic Medical Records:
All this downfalls can be perfectly adressed by medical tourism as international hospitals have to create genuine competitive advantages and online solutions in order to justify the outsourcing of the medical procedure.
Selling the competitive advantages of a foreign hospital to make a difference as an insurer
When looking at Phillipines, actually 5th competitor among Asian medical tourism players, thlocal hospitals must find innovative solutions to compete with mega groups such as Sunway, Parkway or Fortis. What makes this study about the American Health particularly intersting is that the elements listed above are excellent leverage to make a difference for any hospital or for any medical service provider.
In fact, even though the game played by insurers bypasses hospitals, insurers cannot dodge the competition between each other. If American hospitals cannot provide them competitive advantages to make a difference an Asian hospital could give an insurer a clear cut hedge if the latter decides to give credit to medical tourism strategie. Some insurers are now pondering over the fact of proposing medical tourism as an option, referring all the specific features of these foreign based hospitals as differentiating factors.
April 29th, 2007 at 5:36 am
I did not know Fortis was in the Philippines, could you tell me more about it?
Does it have something to do with the Insurance company in Europe?
AA
April 29th, 2007 at 6:55 am
The Fortis aforementionned is a group of hospital in India. I was like you confused at the beginning as I thought that an insurance company could hardly do both.
yet I really wonder if this type of integration is viable… I will further study this in an other article…
June 6th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
Thanks for the answer !
June 20th, 2007 at 11:46 pm
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! rdsdhspmgh
June 27th, 2007 at 10:51 am
Thanks for this site!
guiop.info