Wed 15 Aug 2007
Lost in a Pond: global medical tourism actors
Posted by raphael encaoua under Low cost surgery, Hospital marketing
[9] Comments
Today, as always, I m ready for a rant. Why? Because I don t get certain points in medical tourism, for instance the notion of medical care offering. Two events happened in the last few days:
Hi! I am a medical tourism product on a website: I am slightly yellow and red, can you please find me?
+ a medical tourism entrepreneur stated that offering to the public all kind of cancer, orthopedic and cardiac treatments and surgeries for medical outsourcing was completely logical because of the long tail theory. This is absolutely nonsense for many obvious reasons:
a. not all procedures are fitting to a medical tourism model that implies relatively short stays (people don’t want to die in India far from everyone from what I know) and do not pose any problems when considerong air travel (as people know air transportation because of a difference in air pressure can cause Phlebitis as well as bruises after a heart or spine surgery for instance).
b. people need guidance and no clear cut specialisations mean no real medical ability in the eyes of many medical tourists that I have interviewed. What is the point in bringing up a catalogue with 349 references when I know that bearely 20 of the references will represent 80% of my business (the famed Pareto law). People can argue that internet advantage is to propose anything but I will counter argue that people needs first to undrestand how things are working. The more products one offers the less he is able to put up clear packages and to market them efficiently. I don t think that a list of 235 oncologic treatments with no content associated on a webpage is efficient.
The guy did not agree with me. Yet from what I have learned he only had 3 clients in 2007… Perhaps because his product mix is aweful?
+ Talking about product mix here is my second example. While travelling in Asia I came to discuss many times about Planet Hospital that thanks to its innovative products is making a lot of noise and refered as the market leader by big media outlets. However, all the interviewed hospital marketing manager had the same conclusion: Planet Hospital represented nothing for them. Namely Planet Hospital, despite its reputation, had peanuts bargaining power. How come? planet Hospital is proposing an extremly wide range of hospital and is playing a dumb game as people can opt for the hospital they prefer. Hospitals marketing managers made the following criticisms to Planet Hospital:
a. a too large pool of hospitals naturally scattered volumes and pushed people to be as much of a low cost seeker as they can. IN fact, many of planet hospital’s customers are just looking for bargains and hence are mre concerned by economic rationale than success rate and service quality
b. Planet hospital is not a marketing partner as they do not focus enough on the upsides of each hospitals and hasn’t been able to come up with a clear ranking of hospitals according to specialties. On the company’s website all hospitals seem to be inter exchangeable.
All in all, both example show that medical tourism suffers from one major problem: no marketing mind tried to put up an interesting product ix, it is still too much opportunistic and one sided. Hospitals seem to be despised by much actors and there is no clear cut marketing contribution between medical agencies and hospitals. We can even call this a rift.








